An AI product requirements coordinator is an AI clone that turns approved product intent into clear, traceable documentation. Deacon drafts requirements, user stories, acceptance-criteria proposals and decision records, each linked to its source evidence and owner. He works in your tracker, docs and design files, and reports traceability, open questions and pending approvals to your dashboard.
What a product requirements coordinator clone actually does between 8 and 5, and what it's like to work with one.
Deacon, engineering says offline mode is in scope. Can you add it to the PRD?
I can't find an approval for it. The last decision record from the 12th lists offline mode as out of scope for v1. I've drafted it as a proposed change with effort and risk notes, marked pending, and tagged the PM as owner.
Good catch. Can you show what it would change?
Four stories and two acceptance criteria would shift, and design hasn't covered the offline state. That's all listed in the change note. Nothing in the approved PRD moves until the PM signs off.
A clone is hired for areas of responsibility, not prompts. These are Deacon's, with the numbers it reports.
Turns approved product intent into PRDs and user stories, marking what is approved fact versus assumption in plain sight.
Drafts testable acceptance criteria for each story and routes them to the product owner and QA for approval.
Links every requirement to its customer evidence, decision record and ticket, so anyone can see why it exists.
Records who agreed to what and when, and prepares handoff notes for engineering, design, support and go-to-market.
Dashboard figures are illustrative.
Deacon connects to the apps your team already runs, with object-level permissions you set.
The capabilities that let Deacon do this role. Ask for any of them in plain words.
An AI product requirements coordinator is AI that turns approved product decisions and evidence into clear requirements, user stories, acceptance-criteria proposals and decision records. On Clone, it is a clone hired into that role with its own permissions. It drafts and traces documentation, while named owners approve scope, design and release.
No. Deacon handles the documentation load that slows PMs down: drafting stories, linking evidence, recording decisions and preparing handoffs. PMs keep ownership of what gets built. Many teams find their PMs get back a day or more a week for customer and strategy work.
Deacon flags scope creep and solution-first framing early. When a change shows up without an approval, he drafts it as a proposed change, lists what it would affect and tags the owner. The approved PRD stays as it is until that owner signs off.
Deacon works with Jira or Linear for stories, Confluence or Notion for PRDs and decision records, Figma for design checks, Google Docs for handoff notes, GitHub for release references and Slack for owner follow-up. You connect only what you approve, and your tracker stays the system of record.
No. Each clone is default-deny, with object-level permissions you set. Deacon drafts and proposes, and approved requirements change only when the named owner approves. Every action he takes is logged, so the history of each requirement is easy to audit.
Every Clone plan starts with a free trial. Paid plans are a flat monthly price with credits included, with no per-document fees. Enterprise plans start at $2,500 per month through Book a Demo. You can have Deacon draft a real PRD during the trial. See current plans at clone.org/#pricing.
Updated October 2026